A podcast story says Langley is scanning millions of home DNA kits for “Nordic” blood. The chain of witnesses is thin. The pile of spit in private labs is not. That gap is the story mass outlets keep flattening.
In late May, and again this month when the same package was pushed back into circulation, a simple sentence traveled farther than the evidence under it: the CIA has a back door into 23andMe and Ancestry, and it is using that door to hunt people whose genes do not sit cleanly inside the human family tree.
The claim is not a leaked cable. It is not a court exhibit. It is a second-hand account told on a podcast, then written up by tabloids, then treated on independent channels as the thing official news will not print. The official side answers with a shrug and a line the Pentagon has used for years: there is no proof that visitors from another world walk among us. Both answers leave the useful part on the table. Millions of people mailed their saliva to private firms. Those firms have been hacked, sold, and reorganized. Intelligence services have a long record of wanting exactly this kind of file. You do not need blond giants in a Colorado diner for that part to matter.
What was actually said — and who said it
The public version begins with Jason Reza Jorjani, a philosophy doctor and novelist, speaking on Jesse Michels’ American Alchemy show in November 2025. Jorjani said he had spoken with Lyn Buchanan, a retired U.S. Army sergeant who trained and worked as a remote viewer in the military’s Cold War psychic-spy unit. Buchanan, in Jorjani’s telling, described a CIA effort to screen consumer DNA databases for a genetic variance the agency treats as a marker of so-called Nordics — tall, fair, blue-eyed beings who, in UFO lore, pass as Scandinavians.
Jorjani’s line, as later printed by the Daily Mail on 25 May 2026, is blunt:
“Look, we know that Kit Green at the CIA has some program to access the 23andMe and like whatever, Ancestry.com, databases through some backdoor and that they are screening whoever signs up for these services for a specific genetic variance from the normal Homo sapiens population which the CIA knows to be the genetic marker of these Nordics.”
He added that Buchanan had been approached in a diner by three of these people. They lived, he said, in small towns in the Colorado Rockies. They had fled a hard government on their own world, married humans for generations, and now wanted only peace for children and grandchildren who had been told the family came from Sweden. “The CIA wants to hunt them down,” Jorjani said.
That is the whole spine of the alien half of the story. One author, quoting one veteran, quoting three unnamed diners, naming one former CIA doctor. No date. No town. No lab report. No warrant. No screenshot of a search screen. The Daily Mail wrote that it asked Kit Green, 23andMe and Ancestry for comment. Public replies that settle the charge have not appeared. Military.com later said it also reached the White House, CIA, Pentagon, Jorjani and Buchanan. Same silence on paper.
On 20 September 2026 the Daily Mail pushed the May piece again on its main account. Independent sites reprinted it within a day. That is the “latest news” on this exact claim: not a new document, a second wave of the same interview.
The parts that are real before anyone mentions aliens
Remote viewing is not a campfire tale. From the 1970s into the mid-1990s the CIA, Army and Defense Intelligence Agency funded work later gathered under names such as Grill Flame, Center Lane, Sun Streak and Star Gate. Viewers sat in rooms at Fort Meade and contractor labs and tried to describe distant sites. The program was shut in 1995 after mixed reviews. The files were later declassified in bulk. Buchanan is a known name inside that circle. He trained viewers from 1984 to 1992, wrote The Seventh Sense, and still teaches the method. That history is why his voice carries in this debate. It is also why a jump from “he worked on Star Gate” to “therefore Langley is mining 23andMe for space blood” is a jump, not a proof.
Christopher “Kit” Green is also a real person with a real résumé. He spent 1969 to 1985 at CIA in science and technology work, including early oversight of remote-viewing research at Stanford Research Institute. He later became a physician and forensic brain-imaging specialist and, in later years, studied injury cases tied to strange aerospace events. He left the Agency in 1985. 23andMe was founded in 2006. Ancestry’s consumer DNA kit business took off years after that. Jorjani did not explain how a man who walked out of Langley two decades before those companies existed “has some program” inside their servers today. That calendar problem is not a smear. It is the first thing a careful reader should mark.
Buchanan has said something narrower on his own. In a 2023 interview on Through A Glass Darkly he said he would not spit in a 23andMe tube. He described ancestry pie charts with slices for familiar groups and a leftover wedge marked “other” or unknown. “There are, from what I found out, there are government people who are looking into that wedge,” he said. That sentence is interesting. It is not a lab protocol. In ordinary genetic reports, “other” or unassigned ancestry is the bin for fragments that the company’s reference panels cannot place with confidence. Isolated groups, sparse data, and mixed lines all land there. It is not a scientific label for non-human DNA. Anyone who tells you the wedge is automatically alien is selling a translation the test itself does not make.
What Congress and the whistleblowers added — still second-hand
The hybrid story did not start with Jorjani. It sits in a thicker fog of 2023–2026 disclosure talk.
David Grusch, a former intelligence officer, told Congress under oath in 2023 that the United States has retrieved craft and “non-human biologics.” He has not put a body or a genome on a public bench. Rep. Eric Burlison of Missouri has said, in an X Space and later on the same American Alchemy show, that Grusch described a briefing given to Donald Trump during the first-term impeachment fight. In that telling, Trump was told about more than one kind of visitor, including Nordics said to be only a few hundred years ahead of us and said to have tried cross-breeding. Burlison has been careful in spots: he repeats what he was told, and he has said he will not swear Nordics exist until he sees one. He also said Grusch had no clear answer when asked how a person would know a neighbor was a hybrid.
Former Florida congressman Matt Gaetz went further in a March 2026 interview with Benny Johnson. He said a uniformed Army soldier briefed him, in a non-classified setting with staff present, on six to twelve sites where captured beings were being bred with people taken from war zones and migrant routes, to make a go-between race that could talk across worlds. Gaetz said out loud that he did not check the claim. That admission belongs next to the sentence, not under it.
Set the three tracks side by side and you see the pattern mass desks rarely draw: Jorjani quotes Buchanan; Burlison quotes Grusch; Gaetz quotes an unnamed soldier. None of those tracks has produced a statute, a budget line, a sample, or a named facility that a reporter can walk to. The Pentagon’s public line is still that it has no proof of visitors. The same government has, in 2026, dumped old UAP files in batches under a Trump-era transparency push. Both things can be true at once. A file dump is not a confession of a breeding farm. A denial is not a full inventory.
Readers who want the wider UAP weather on this site can start with the May file on a missing Air Force research chief, UFO General McCasland Vanishes After Space Force Dinner, and with the June case of a hacked Brazilian alert that screamed “alien attack” when no attack existed: Humans, We Have Arrived. Panic and secrecy travel on the same roads.
The quieter story: what already happens to your spit
Here is the part that does not need a diner in the Rockies.
Ancestry says it holds the world’s largest consumer DNA network, more than 30 million people. 23andMe has said more than 15 million people have used its service. In October 2023 attackers pulled personal data on about 6.9 million 23andMe customers. In March 2025 the company filed for Chapter 11. After a fight over who would buy the genetic file, a bankruptcy judge approved a sale to TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit set up by co-founder Anne Wojcicki, which closed in July 2025 for about $305 million. States had sued to block a sale of the data without fresh consent. The winning bid came with promises to keep deletion rights and old privacy rules. Promises are not the same as a lock that cannot be picked.
On 14 July 2026, Connecticut’s attorney general announced a multi-state settlement over the 2023 breach with the bankruptcy estate, plus a separate class payout. That is not folklore. It is a paper trail that says: this database is precious, it was mishandled, and governments already treat it as a public problem.
Ancestry’s own transparency report covering 2025, posted in early 2026, says it received zero valid requests for customer DNA data that year, nine requests for non-DNA account data, and “never received a classified request pursuant to the national security laws of the United States or any other country.” The company says it needs a court order or warrant before it will even consider producing genetic data, and that it does not let police use the site as a hunting ground. Those statements are useful. They are also the company’s statements. A secret back door, by definition, would not appear in a marketing transparency page. A reader can hold both thoughts without joining a church of either side.
What is settled in open law is smaller and colder. Police in the United States have used public genetic-genealogy sites, and in some cases company databases under legal process, to identify suspects through relatives who volunteered their DNA. That method broke the Golden State Killer case. It also taught every serious service on Earth that a family tree is a map of people who never agreed to be mapped. If an intelligence shop wanted “unusual variance” rather than a burglar, the technical temptation would be the same. You do not need to believe in Nordics to see why a spy agency would drool on a 30-million-person SNP file.
That is the sentence alternative media is reaching for, and the sentence official science desks keep wrapping in ridicule until the ridicule covers the privacy point too. For how civilian health research and intelligence work have already shared a hallway, see this site’s file on the CIA–NIAID paper trail: CIA-NIAID Pact: What New Fauci Documents Actually Show. For the older habit of secret human experiments, see MK-Ultra in Congress. Those files are not proof of alien hunting. They are proof that “we would never” is not a full answer.
Health, blood, and the myth that grew around a pie chart
Consumer kits do two jobs. They guess ancestry from markers compared with reference groups. They flag health risks — clotting, cancers, drug reactions — from known variants. Neither job is designed to certify species. Human DNA already contains leftovers from older cousins. Most people of non-African ancestry carry a sliver of Neanderthal sequence. Some groups carry Denisovan bits. Scientists argue over other ghost populations. None of that is “Nordic from another star.” It is the messy book of this planet.
Still, the body is political. Height, skin, hair, and disease risk cluster in families and regions. A state that wanted to sort people has always reached for blood, from old race science to modern forensic databanks. The Nordic myth in UFO writing — tall, pale, kind, almost us — sits on top of a much older European dream about hidden bloodlines. That is why the story spreads. It flatters some listeners and frightens others. It also lets a real fight about medical privacy wear a costume that editors can laugh at, which is convenient if you would rather not write about warrants, bankruptcy sales, and who owns a genome after the brand name changes.
If you care about the health side without the costume, stay on the boring ground this site already works: food, minerals, pressure in the veins. Start with Garlic and Blood Pressure and Magnesium Beyond Pumpkin Seeds. Your kit may tell you a variant. It will not tell you who is reading the file next year.
Geopolitics under the folklore
Why would a great power care about strange blood even if the diner story is theater? Three plain reasons sit in the open.
First, identity. A genome file plus a home address is a census that people paid to join. In a season of migration fights, sanctions, and great-power tech wars, that census is a tool.
Second, medicine as leverage. Rare variants, immune quirks, and drug responses are dual-use knowledge. The same sheet that warns you about a statin can, in bulk, sketch a population. The CIA–health research overlap is no longer a rumor in at least one paper trail, as noted above.
Third, the sky. 2026 has not been quiet above the atmosphere. The United States has begun saying out loud that it fields weapons in orbit. China and Russia answer in kind. UAP hearings and file releases run in parallel with that arms talk. When officials speak in half-sentences about objects they cannot explain, a public hungry for a full sentence will fill it with Nordics, greys, or demons. JD Vance has used the last word. Others use the first. The hardware contest is real either way. See Orbit Weapons Admitted. Joint Chiefs Now Point at the Moon.
None of those three reasons proves a hunt for space hybrids. All three explain why a story about a hunt will not die.
What a careful reader can hold at the same time
Hold this list without flinching:
- The Star Gate remote-viewing program existed, was funded, and was closed. Buchanan was in it.
- Kit Green was a CIA scientist and later a doctor who worked the edges of UAP injury cases. He left the Agency in 1985, before consumer DNA giants existed.
- Jorjani’s account of a CIA back door into 23andMe and Ancestry is, so far, a story about a story. No public technical evidence has been shown.
- Buchanan’s own on-record caution is about an “other” wedge and “government people” looking at it — not a published protocol naming Nordics.
- Members of Congress have repeated hybrid briefings they attribute to Grusch or to unnamed soldiers. They have not produced a site you can photograph.
- The Pentagon still says it has no proof of alien life. The same state has released old UAP paper and still classifies much more.
- Tens of millions of DNA profiles sit in private firms that have been breached, bankrupted, and sold. That is the hard fact under the soft myth.
Mass desks tend to print the last official sentence and mock the diner. Alternative desks tend to print the diner and skip the calendar problem with Kit Green. A grown-up file prints both and leaves the verdict with you.
If there is a hunt, the honest demand is simple: show the marker, show the legal theory, show the audit. If there is no hunt, the honest demand is the same for the companies: show who can query the raw file, under what order, after a sale, after a breach. Until those pages exist, the curiosity gap stays open on purpose. That gap is not a reason to swallow a fairy tale. It is also not a reason to pretend spit in a tube is a private letter.
Source note and a short word for fact checkers
Original news package: Chris Melore, “CIA accused of using Ancestry and 23andMe to ‘hunt down’ alien bloodlines in millions of DNA tests,” Daily Mail, 25 May 2026 (updated the same day). Full link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15845349/cia-ancestry-23andme-alien-dna.html. The paper cited Jorjani’s November 2025 American Alchemy interview and Buchanan’s 2023 Through A Glass Darkly remarks. The Mail’s account was recirculated on 20 September 2026 and reprinted across independent sites on 21 September 2026.
Primary and first-rank supporting links: Ancestry 2025 transparency report on government requests — Ancestry law-enforcement report. Connecticut AG settlement notice on the 23andMe breach, 14 July 2026 — state settlement release. Military.com recap of the claim and the Star Gate backdrop — Military.com. New York Post write-up, 26 May 2026 — NY Post.
Disclaimer for fact checkers: This article reports claims made by named private speakers and elected officials. It does not treat those claims as proven fact. The Daily Mail package and the podcast it rests on are secondary accounts. No public forensic paper, warrant, or agency document produced for this file confirms a CIA search of consumer DNA for non-human markers. Company privacy pages and transparency reports are self-reported. Readers should weigh the thin witness chain on the alien claim separately from the thick, documented record on breaches, bankruptcy, and the market for genetic files. Ridicule of the first is not a substitute for scrutiny of the second.
Original article: CIA DNA Hunt for Alien Bloodlines: What the Record Actually Shows on Planet Today 🚀
Automatically republished from the main blog.