Canada’s socialized healthcare system plans to euthanize an estimated 15 million Canadians between 2027 and 2047, a staggering figure in a country with a population of 41 million people.
Kelsi Sheren, a Canadian combat veteran, host of The Kelsi Sheren Perspective, and an outspoken opponent of Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) policies, explained that the Canadian government has documented plans to euthanize more than a third of the national population under the pretext of “cost savings.”
Bill Gates admitted in 2011 the global elite were planning on instituting death panels to decide when you are no longer useful to society, using the same “cost savings” argument. In countries including Canada, Switzerland, and the Netherlands, we are seeing what this plan looks like in reality.
While doctor-assisted suicide in the U.S. hasn’t yet reached the dystopian levels seen in Canada, the so-called “death with dignity” movement is accelerating—and fast. With New York’s controversial bill awaiting Governor Hochul’s signature, America edges closer to normalizing state-sanctioned death. If passed, 11 states and Washington, D.C., will have legalized this deeply disturbing practice.
But the agenda isn’t going unchallenged. A growing network of independent journalists, online investigators, and citizen watchdogs is working tirelessly to expose the truth: this isn’t about compassion—it’s about control.
LifeSite report: Since Oregon first legalized assisted suicide in 1997, nearly 10,000 deaths have occurred under such laws. Nevertheless, with a culture increasingly embracing death as a solution, it’s difficult to predict whether the U.S. will ultimately follow Canada’s troubling example by normalizing assisted death instead of prioritizing compassionate care.
What often goes unnoticed, however, is that existing U.S. healthcare policies are already enabling the quiet killing of vulnerable Americans – not through legalized suicide, but through hospital protocols and policies that deny care, withdraw treatment, or subtly hasten death.
Though it’s impossible to know the precise numbers, with nearly 25,000 hospitals, nursing homes, and hospices operating across the U.S., it’s clear that far more patients have become victims of a healthcare system driven by institutional directives prioritizing cost-efficiency over humane, patient-centered care.
Even more alarming is that this growing disregard for human life isn’t occurring in a vacuum; it reflects a deeper cultural shift toward a utilitarian worldview, in which the inalienable worth of every individual, regardless of age, disability, or prognosis, is increasingly ignored. Instead of viewing vulnerable individuals as persons worthy of protection, too many policymakers and healthcare authorities now view them as “costs” to be managed and burdens to be removed.
When policymakers and medical groups begin framing suffering as something best eliminated through death rather than alleviated through patient-centered care, the outcome is a gradual, systemic abandonment of vulnerable populations, especially those unable to advocate for themselves.
For decades, U.S. healthcare policies, which have been shaped by hospital administrators, lawmakers, and medical ethicists, have quietly undermined life-affirming treatments. Decisions increasingly fall into the hands of bureaucrats and healthcare systems steered by financial considerations, rather than being made by patients, their families, or surrogates.
These include medical futility policies, non-consensual imposition of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, terminal sedation intended to hasten death, use of brain death or persistent vegetative state (PVS) diagnoses to justify withdrawal of care, pro-death advance directives, and the denial of due process for families seeking to dispute medical decisions, to name a few.
Perhaps most concerning, basic care – nutrition and hydration provided via feeding tubes – has been reclassified as “medical treatment.” Since the 1980s, this shift has allowed doctors to remove feeding tubes even from patients who are neither terminal nor actively dying and who can otherwise process food and hydration. This single policy change has endangered countless medically vulnerable people.
The writing is on the wall. What began as a plea for “dignity” is rapidly morphing into a global experiment in managed death. As more governments embrace euthanasia as a “solution,” it’s up to independent voices to sound the alarm. This isn’t compassion—it’s quiet coercion. And unless we push back, the line between care and control will vanish entirely.
