For three years, Canadian officials embedded in the Trudeau regime secretly injected Inuit children with an experimental RSV Palivizumab vaccine—without parental consent and without informing the Inuit community.
This disturbing revelation, uncovered through newly obtained Freedom of Information (FOI) emails, exposes a shocking breach of medical ethics and raises serious questions about the Trudeau government-led medical experiments on Indigenous populations—and the entire Canadian population.
Canadian investigative journalist Donald Best uncovered emails proving that Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, was fully aware of the ethical concerns. So were other top public health officials.
Donald Best reports: In a December 16, 2019, email to Tam and other senior officials, Dr. Tom Wong, Director General of the Office of Population & Public Health at Indigenous Services Canada, explicitly warned that health care workers had raised serious red flags about the program.
“Some ethical concerns were raised by health care workers regarding the guarantee of a free and informed consent from parents or caregivers, as well as the absence of involvement of Inuit population in the decision and implementation process.” — Dr. Tom Wong to Dr. Theresa Tam and others, December 16, 2019
Yet, rather than halt the program, the government pressed forward. Parents were kept in the dark, as were Inuit leaders and the broader community. Worse, the experiment had already failed – the RSV Palivizumab vaccine* injections didn’t work as intended.
But officials concealed this and continued using an Indigenous population as unknowing test subjects.
This isn’t the first time Canada’s medical establishment has used Indigenous children as test subjects without consent.
From the 1940s-50s nutritional experiments in residential schools, where researchers deliberately starved Indigenous children to study malnutrition, to the 1933 tuberculosis vaccine trials on 600 Indigenous children in Saskatchewan, where nearly 20% died, history has already proven that officials were willing to sacrifice Indigenous lives for so-called “science.” (ref **)
“The difference between medical research’s clinical trials and human experimentation is patient consent. Given the very unequal power relationships between medical staff and patients, coupled with often perplexing language barriers, and the widespread perception that many Aboriginal people would not willingly accept treatment, patient consent for treatment was often simply taken for granted.” (Lux, M. Separate Beds, University of Toronto Press, 2016, p.112)
